影片《满江红》配乐备受好评 摇滚豫剧先于电影完成******
影片《满江红》配乐备受观众好评，创作人韩红透露：
摇滚豫剧先于电影完成
本报记者 王金跃
电影《满江红》票房连连告捷，其电影配乐也独具特色，引起观众的注意。影片由著名歌手韩红配乐作曲。在接受记者采访时，韩红坦言，当初在接到张艺谋导演的邀请之后，她一度心里狂喜，因为这是她第一次为一部电影作曲——为电影配乐作曲，一直是韩红藏在心里的梦想。
但很快，韩红就高兴不起来了，因为她发现，张艺谋“变脸”了。“原来我们就认识，每次见到他，都是笑嘻嘻的，很亲切，但真成为工作伙伴后，他就变得非常挑衅和难搞。有一段时间，我感觉自己都快坚持不下去了。”
说归说，但这也激起了韩红的好奇心。有一次，她跟张艺谋建议，岳飞是河南人，可不可以在电影中用豫剧，张艺谋很兴奋，不过很快他就说，自己不要嘻哈和说唱。韩红一惊，“你怎么知道我要用这个？”张艺谋说，你以前就是做这个的。韩红在吃惊之余，不由心生佩服。
最后，韩红想到了将豫剧和电子音乐结合起来，片中西洋音乐和中国传统音乐的混搭，迸发出一种戏剧感强烈的效果，这给观众留下了很深的印象。
韩红为此创作了90多段配乐，但在张艺谋“挑剔”的筛选后，被灭了27段。
韩红邀请了河南豫剧院首席板胡琴师李洪超和洛阳知名乐队斑马森林联合制作，并在全片贯穿使用了笙、笛、琴、筚篥、唢呐等传统乐器进行演奏，配合故事的推进，烘托出人物的情感传递，将音乐很好地融入故事的表达中。
片中出现的豫剧配乐改编自《探阴山》《包公辞朝》《包青天》《穆桂英挂帅》《下陈州》等河南经典豫剧唱段，并邀请了有着“中原第一女丑”称号的张晓英演唱。张晓英出生于梨园世家，擅长豫剧、曲剧、越调、小品等，她从黑头成功转型为彩旦，现为河南省曲剧团演员。韩红透露，为了配合电影的情绪和节奏，张晓英在唱法上做了改动，“相比原来的豫剧唱段，电影配乐中的唱腔去掉了原有的拖腔，融入了摇滚元素来加强声音的节奏感和穿透力。”从去年10月份接到邀请到11月底，张晓英多次来到北京的录音棚里录制，花了两天时间，这些配唱就录制完成了。这时候，电影还没有开拍，也就是说，这些音乐是最早完成的部分。
《满江红》开篇的唱段选自《包公辞朝》，而《穆桂英挂帅》《五世请缨》等选段，则用在瑶琴出现的段落中。每个唱段都有明确的含义，跟电影的主题高度吻合。此外，韩红还演唱了《满江红》的同名推广曲。
如今，随着电影公映，电影音乐广受好评，韩红也体验到了满满的成就感，“我现在终于可以为电影作曲了。”
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
| 彩神彩票地图 |
